NOW:53209:USA01012
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01012
18°
H 30° L 18°
Light Snow | 17MPH

Lowe’s Violates EPA’s Lead Safe Renovation Rule

I was surprised. I am appalled. My wife and I decided to go for a walk around the neighborhood and what I saw was extremely disturbing. Workers from Lowe’s were installing windows in one of my neighbors homes and did not take any precautions what so ever to comply with lead safe renovation.

Lowe's Window Installation

On April 22nd, the EPA’s new lead safe renovator laws went into effect requiring contractors who work on homes built prior to 1978 take precautions to safeguard homeowners against lead poisoning. To be certified, contractors must complete a day long course on lead safe renovation and use lead safe practices to contain lead dust.

Lead was a common paint additive prior to 1978 and high levels of lead contamination have caused people to become ill and for children to develop cognitive disabilities. Especially at high risk are children and women who may be pregnant. The federal government requires lead safe renovation on all homes with lead paint levels of 0.5% or more to go through strict containment procedures. There is a readily available test on the market that will tell if lead levels are high enough to require lead safe renovator practices must be used. Wisconsin is the only state in the country to require lead safe renovations where lead levels are higher than 0.06%. The technology is not yet available to make a commercially available test that will record lead levels that low. This means that legitimate, law abiding contractors must either purchase a $40,000 machine to test lead levels or they must assume lead is present and take precautions accordingly.

Lowe’s is not one of those law abiding contractors.

Last month I warned of this. I wrote that there will be some contractors who simply ignore the laws rather than deal with the approximately $100 per window cost that contractors will have to bear. It was my assessment at that time that it would be the small, unlicensed Mom and Pop operations that happen to own a truck and a ladder and masquerade as legitimate contractors who would ignore the laws. It was those unlicensed businesses, I contended, that would continue to sell windows at the same market price as they always had, while legitimate contractors who had taken the courses, acquired the certifications, purchased the equipment, and used lead safe renovation techniques would be at a disadvantage.

Well I was right — sort of. I say sort of because the first contractor I saw violate this law was Lowe’s.

I did not expect to see a “Lowe’s Installation in Progress” sign in front of one of my neighbors home with workers slamming in windows without any roping off of the job site or any plastic containment barriers.

Having taken the courses and incurred the expenses to become a Lead Safe Renovator, I was appalled to see installers ignoring all safety requirements in a home with two small children. Lead poisoning is not a funny little game. It is a serious problem requiring painful chelation therapy for anyone who has been adversely affected. It is unconscionable for a contractor to cut corners to safe a few dollars when children are standing nearby watching the installation and playing in the work zone. To see a renovator who so blatantly ignores these rules when children and women of child bearing age are nearby is mind-blowing and irresponsible.

But never, never in a million years, would I have expected one of my favorite home improvement stores to be utilizing such unsafe practices and putting homeowners, children and even possibly babies inutero at danger. I am saddened to see that Lowe’s would use such irresponsible practices to make a buck.

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can register through your Facebook account, sign on with your Facebook password and use the same photo and screen name. If you don’t want your account tied to Facebook, you can keep your registration through our site.
  • You can now personalize your Journal Sentinel account with a photo even if the account is not tied to Facebook.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
  1. To Mr & Mrs Kravitz Did it ever occur to you that these windows DID NOT have lead based paint in them? You simply cannot tell just by the age of a home. My home for example was built in 1963 and all the interior trims & casing were replaced in the 1980s..therefore they do not presently have any lead in them.. also my original wood work & mouldings were STAINED not painted. Also with many window manufacurers... even if there was lead based paint on them.. many installations do not DISTURB the paint.. The key word is DISTURB.. many window sashes from the 1950 's (which looks like the case here) can simply be lifted out without and i repeat without DISTURBING ANY MOULDINGS! EACH and every installation is DIFFERENT. Many homes are replacing windows the second and third time around ...Did you and your wife go into the home from the inside and TEST that lead based paint existed or that it was being DISTURBED??? I DO NOT have any affiliation with Lowes whatsoever but for someone to post this without PROOF that lead paint exists, I think Lowes should contact thier attorneys ASAP.
  2. I really don't think the EPA rule is overkill in cases where there are children and women of child bearing age in the home.

    However, the Wisconsin law of .06% is pure overkill. To make matters worse, they don't even enforce it from what I'm seeing. They simply fleece contractors of the fees and that's the end of the story.

    My fear is that law abiding businesses will be outbid by businesses who are ignoring the lead safe renovating practices. Essentially, those who follow the law are at a disadvantage. Since the homeowner will not be penalized one way or another, they have no motivation to go with a higher bid which complies with the law.

    Effectively, this law gives lawbreakers (like Lowe's in this case) an advantage over legitimate law complying businesses.
  3. This new EPA law is like using a sledgehammer to swat flies. Lead paint is an overblown problem, always has been. I have a better idea, why don’t we swab every Section 8 and public housing building for Crack residue and then shut them down.
Back to top

Page Tools

  • Share

advertisement

Latest Posts